Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Migrate NVPs to their new keys #37556

Merged
merged 24 commits into from
Mar 20, 2024
Merged

Migrate NVPs to their new keys #37556

merged 24 commits into from
Mar 20, 2024

Conversation

iwiznia
Copy link
Contributor

@iwiznia iwiznia commented Feb 29, 2024

Held on https://github.com/Expensify/Web-Expensify/pull/41082
Held on https://github.com/Expensify/Web-Expensify/pull/41300

Details

Fixed Issues

https://github.com/Expensify/Expensify/issues/372366

Tests

  • Check that priority mode, language, preferred skin tone and frequently used emojis are preserved and work properly
  • (no qa) Using the dev tools, check all data was migrated correctly to the new key and removed from the old key
  • Sign up as a new user, check the welcome banner is shown:
image

Offline tests

No

QA Steps

Same as tests

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
Android: mWeb Chrome
iOS: Native
iOS: mWeb Safari
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
MacOS: Desktop

@iwiznia iwiznia self-assigned this Feb 29, 2024
@iwiznia iwiznia changed the title Migrate NVPs to their new keys [HOLD] Migrate NVPs to their new keys Mar 1, 2024
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ import * as Report from '@userActions/Report';
import CONST from '@src/CONST';
import ONYXKEYS from '@src/ONYXKEYS';
import type * as OnyxTypes from '@src/types/onyx';
import type {DismissedReferralBanners} from '@src/types/onyx/Account';
import type DismissedReferralBanners from '@src/types/onyx/DismissedReferralBanners';
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
import type DismissedReferralBanners from '@src/types/onyx/DismissedReferralBanners';

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Also, please apply these changes in this file:

-   dismissedReferralBanners: DismissedReferralBanners;
+   dismissedReferralBanners: OnyxEntry<OnyxTypes.DismissedReferralBanners>;

-                           shouldShowReferralCTA={!dismissedReferralBanners[CONST.REFERRAL_PROGRAM.CONTENT_TYPES.START_CHAT]}
+                           shouldShowReferralCTA={!dismissedReferralBanners?.[CONST.REFERRAL_PROGRAM.CONTENT_TYPES.START_CHAT]}

@iwiznia iwiznia marked this pull request as ready for review March 5, 2024 19:52
@iwiznia iwiznia requested a review from a team as a code owner March 5, 2024 19:52
@iwiznia iwiznia requested a review from tgolen March 5, 2024 19:53
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot removed the request for review from a team March 5, 2024 19:53
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Mar 5, 2024

@grgia Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from grgia March 5, 2024 19:53
@iwiznia
Copy link
Contributor Author

iwiznia commented Mar 5, 2024

This is on hold, but please review it

@@ -111,22 +111,28 @@ const ONYXKEYS = {
NVP_PRIORITY_MODE: 'nvp_priorityMode',

/** Contains the users's block expiration (if they have one) */
NVP_BLOCKED_FROM_CONCIERGE: 'private_blockedFromConcierge',
NVP_BLOCKED_FROM_CONCIERGE: 'nvp_private_blockedFromConcierge',
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It would really be great to group all these together under an NVP key like:

ONYXKEYS: {
    NVP: {
        BLOCKED_FROM_CONCIERGE: 'nvp_private_blockedFromConcierge',
    },
};

Or if not that, at least put all the NVPs next to each other in this file.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Moving them to be together mostly because I don't know how to make my IDE refactor this automatically and I don't want to have to update 420 files.

src/libs/migrations/NVPMigration.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
import Onyx from 'react-native-onyx';
import ONYXKEYS from '@src/ONYXKEYS';

const migrations = {

This comment was marked as resolved.

Onyx.multiSet({
[newKey]: value,
[oldKey]: null,
});
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's been a while since I've done the migrations, but do you know if it's a bad thing that this doesn't wait for the multiSet() promise to be resolved before calling resolveWhenDone()? I think it could technically mean that the migration finishes before the actual changes are committed to storage. If the app then tries to load in that state, it could cause issues (even fatal errors maybe).

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, I just noticed this in while writing the message above, fixing it.

key: oldKey,
callback: (value) => {
Onyx.disconnect(connectionID);
if (value !== null) {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

NAB: I'm kind of surprised that there aren't lint warnings to switch these to early returns. I guess it's because there is no return statement, but I think it would be nice to follow the style of early returns so the code style is consistent.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I like this approach more because if I do early return I will need to call resolveWhenDone twice

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Disregard, changing this given I need to pass resolveWhenDone to the promise too

waitForCollectionCallback: true,
callback: (value) => {
Onyx.disconnect(connectionIDRecentlyUsedTags);
if (!value) {

This comment was marked as resolved.

@iwiznia iwiznia requested a review from tgolen March 6, 2024 16:35
Co-authored-by: Tim Golen <tgolen@gmail.com>
tgolen
tgolen previously approved these changes Mar 6, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@tgolen tgolen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for grouping the NVPs and switching to early returns!

@iwiznia iwiznia requested a review from mkhutornyi March 7, 2024 18:48
grgia
grgia previously approved these changes Mar 18, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@grgia grgia left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

code LGTM, my remaining comments are NAB

Copy link
Contributor

@mkhutornyi mkhutornyi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM2! Just waiting for backend PR (fixing #37556 (comment)) to hit production

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from hayata-suenaga March 18, 2024 13:25
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Mar 18, 2024

@hayata-suenaga Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Mar 18, 2024

🎯 @mkhutornyi, thanks for reviewing and testing this PR! 🎉

An E/App issue has been created to issue payment here: #38470.

@iwiznia
Copy link
Contributor Author

iwiznia commented Mar 18, 2024

@mkhutornyi the reviewer checklist failed... maybe it is outdated or something?

@mkhutornyi
Copy link
Contributor

It's success but don't merge yet. I still need to verify signup flow after backend deploy.

@iwiznia iwiznia requested review from tgolen and grgia March 18, 2024 15:32
@hayata-suenaga hayata-suenaga removed their request for review March 18, 2024 18:47
@hayata-suenaga
Copy link
Contributor

seems like the PR has been already reviewed removing myself from the reviewer list 😄

@iwiznia iwiznia changed the title Migrate NVPs to their new keys [HOLD] Migrate NVPs to their new keys Mar 18, 2024
@iwiznia iwiznia changed the title [HOLD] Migrate NVPs to their new keys Migrate NVPs to their new keys Mar 19, 2024
@iwiznia
Copy link
Contributor Author

iwiznia commented Mar 19, 2024

@mkhutornyi can you retest now please?

@tgolen @grgia please re-review.

Copy link
Contributor

@mkhutornyi mkhutornyi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🟢

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from marcochavezf March 20, 2024 15:43
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Mar 20, 2024

@marcochavezf Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@iwiznia iwiznia merged commit bc9eb16 into main Mar 20, 2024
16 checks passed
@iwiznia iwiznia deleted the ionatan_migratenvps branch March 20, 2024 16:03
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/iwiznia in version: 1.4.56-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/yuwenmemon in version: 1.4.56-8 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants